XUSUSIY OLIY TA'LIM MUASSASALARINI RIVOJLANTIRISH LOYIHALARINI BOSHQARISHNING NAZARIY VA METODOLOGIK ASOSLARI
Keywords:
Kalit so‘zlar: xususiy oliy ta'lim muassasasi, loyiha boshqaruvi, strategik boshqaruv, xavflarni boshqarish, manfaatdor tomonlar, transmilliy ta'lim, loyihalar portfeli, boshqaruv modeli.Abstract
Annotatsiya. Maqolada xususiy oliy ta'lim muassasalarini (OTM) rivojlantirish jarayoni loyiha boshqaruvi nuqtai nazaridan tahlil qilinadi. Loyiha boshqaruvi, strategik boshqaruv, xavflarni boshqarish va manfaatdor tomonlar nazariyalari oliy ta'lim kontekstida o‘zaro bog‘lab ko‘rib chiqiladi. Transmilliy ta'lim va xorijiy hamkorlikdagi universitetlar bo‘yicha xalqaro adabiyotlar hamda O‘zbekiston oliy ta'limining so‘nggi statistik ko‘rsatkichlari asosida xususiy OTM rivojlanishining to‘rt bosqichli tahlili, xavflar tasnifi va manfaatdor tomonlar xaritasi ishlab chiqildi. Xususiy OTM rivojlanishini bir martalik loyiha emas, balki o‘zaro bog‘langan loyihalar portfeli sifatida boshqarishni taklif etadi va strategik, portfel, loyiha hamda qo‘llab-quvvatlovchi qatlamlardan iborat konseptual boshqaruv modelini asoslaydi. Maqola natijalari oliy ta'lim rahbarlari, siyosat ishlab chiquvchilar va keyingi empirik tadqiqotlar uchun nazariy asos bo‘la oladi.
References
1. O‘zbekiston Respublikasining "Ta'lim to‘g‘risida"gi Qonuni, O‘RQ-637, 2020-yil 23-sentabr.
2. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining "O‘zbekiston Respublikasi oliy ta'lim tizimini 2030-yilgacha rivojlantirish konsepsiyasini tasdiqlash to‘g‘risida"gi PF-5847-sonli Farmoni, 2019-yil 8-oktabr.
3. Project Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) and The Standard for Project Management. 7th ed. Newtown Square, PA: PMI, 2021.
4. Kerzner H. Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. 13th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2022.
5. Birnbaum R. How Colleges Work: The Cybernetics of Academic Organization and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1988.
6. Clark B.R. Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1998.
7. ISO 21502:2020. Project, programme and portfolio management: Guidance on project management. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2020.
8. Morris P.W.G. Reconstructing Project Management. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.
9. Shenhar A.J., Dvir D. Reinventing Project Management: The Diamond Approach to Successful Growth and Innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2007.
10. Pinto J.K., Slevin D.P. Critical factors in successful project implementation // IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 1987. Vol. EM-34, No. 1. P. 22-27.
11. Eckel P.D., Kezar A. Taking the Reins: Institutional Transformation in Higher Education. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2003.
12. Kotter J.P. Leading Change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1996.
13. Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P. The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that drive performance // Harvard Business Review. 1992. Vol. 70, No. 1. P. 71-79.
14. Freeman R.E. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman, 1984.
15. Mitchell R.K., Agle B.R., Wood D.J. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts // Academy of Management Review. 1997. Vol. 22, No. 4. P. 853-886.
16. ISO 31000:2018. Risk management: Guidelines. Geneva: ISO, 2018.
17. Flyvbjerg B., Bruzelius N., Rothengatter W. Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
18. Knight J. Transnational education remodeled: Toward a common TNE framework and definitions // Journal of Studies in International Education. 2016. Vol. 20, No. 1. P. 34-47.
19. Altbach P.G., Knight J. The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities // Journal of Studies in International Education. 2007. Vol. 11, No. 3-4. P. 290-305.
20. Wilkins S. Establishing international branch campuses: A framework for assessing opportunities and risks // Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 2016. Vol. 38, No. 2. P. 167-182.
21. Lane J.E., Kinser K. Reconsidering privatization in cross-border engagement: The sometimes public nature of private activity // Higher Education Policy. 2011. Vol. 24. P. 255-273.
22. Altbach P.G., Reisberg L., Rumbley L.E. Trends in Global Higher Education: Tracking an Academic Revolution. Paris: UNESCO, 2009.
23. Yep.uz. Higher education in Uzbekistan 2026 (Milliy statistika qo‘mitasi ma'lumotlari asosida). URL: https://yep.uz/en/2026/06/higher-education-uzbekistan-2026/ (murojaat sanasi: 06.10.2026).
24. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Milliy statistika qo‘mitasi. Oliy ta'lim tashkilotlari soni dinamikasi. URL: https://stat.uz/en/press-center/news-of-committee/68798-olij-talim-tashkilotlari-soni-35-jilda-anchaga-k-pajdi-4 (murojaat sanasi: 06.10.2026).
25. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Milliy statistika qo‘mitasi. Xorijiy OTMlar soni dinamikasi. URL: https://stat.uz/en/press-center/news-of-committee/69877-zbekistonda-khorizhij-otmlar-soni-s-nggi-10-jilda-4-3-barobarga-k-pajdi-4
