GAYMORITNI TASHXISLASHDA RENTGENOGRAFIYANING AHAMIYATI
Keywords:
Ассистент кафедры медицинской государственного медицинского университетаAbstract
Gaymorit (maksiller sinusit) — burun bo'shlig'i atrofidagi maksiller
sinuslarning yallig'lanish kasalligi bo'lib, dunyo bo'ylab eng ko'p uchraydigan yuqori
nafas yo'llari patologiyalaridan biri hisoblanadi. Mazkur maqolada gaymoritni
tashxislashda rentgenologik tekshiruvning tutgan o'rni, klinik ahamiyati, turli
proyeksiyalardagi rentgenografiya usullari va ularning CT skanerlash bilan qiyosiy
tahlili yoritilgan. Tadqiqotda 120 nafar bemor ishtirok etib, ularning barchasi klinik
ko'rik, rentgenografiya (Waters va Caldwell proyeksiyalari) va kompyuter
tomografiyasi (CT) bilan tekshirilgan. Rentgenografiyaning maksiller sinusitni
aniqlashdagi sezgirligi 89.2%, xususiylik ko'rsatkichi 87.0% ni tashkil etgan. Havo
suyuqlik satxi va to'liq qorayish belgilari rentgenogrammalarda kuzatilganda CT bilan
tasdiqlash darajasi 100% ga teng bo'lgan. Natijalar shuni ko'rsatdiki, rentgenografiya,
ayniqsa Waters proyeksiyasi, birlamchi skrining usuli sifatida yuqori diagnostik
qiymatga ega. Biroq CT skanerlash murakkab hollarda, ayniqsa etmoid, frontal va
References
1. Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Mullol J, et al. EPOS 2012: European position paper on
rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2012. A summary for otorhinolaryngologists.
Rhinology. 2012;50(1):1–12. PMID: 22469599.
2. Bhatta R, Deo AK, Bhusal S, et al. Sensitivity of Sinus Radiography Compared to
Computed Tomogram: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study from Western Region of
Nepal. Nepal Med Coll J. 2020;22(1-2):50–55. PMC: PMC7580457.
3. Mujica-Mota MA, Waissbluth S, et al. Conventional sinus radiography compared
with CT in the diagnosis of acute sinusitis. Acta Otolaryngol. 2003;123:817–823.
PMID: 12820855.4. Burke TF, Guertler AT, Timmons JH. Comparison of sinus X-rays with computed
tomography scans in acute sinusitis. Acad Emerg Med. 1994;1(3):235–239.
5. Konen E, Faibel M, Kleinbaum Y, et al. The value of the occipitomental (Waters')
view in diagnosis of sinusitis: a comparative study with computed tomography. Clin
Radiol. 2000;55(11):856–860. PMID: 11069741.
6. Usman A, Hashim HT. The role of plain radiographs in the diagnosis of chronic
maxillary rhinosinusitis in adults. Ann Afr Med. 2013;12(1):38–43. PMC:
PMC3598286. PMID: 23515592.
7. Noh H, Kim S, Han SS, et al. Deep Learning for Diagnosis of Paranasal Sinusitis
Using Multi-View Radiographs. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11(2):250. PMC:
PMC7914751.
8. Kim YK, Kim HJ, Kim Y, et al. Evaluation of maxillary sinusitis from panoramic
radiographs and cone-beam computed tomographic images using a convolutional
neural network. Oral Radiol. 2022;38:460–469. PMC: PMC9226235.
9. Levin LG, Law AS, Ether SM, et al. Clinical efficacy of main radiological diagnostic
methods for odontogenic maxillary sinusitis. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21(8):2495
2502. PMID: 28733779.
10. Janner SF, Caversaccio MD, Dubach P, et al. Radiographic findings in the
maxillary sinus: comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40(4):344–348. PMID: 21483887.
11. Fischborn AR, Andreis JD, Wambier LM, et al. Performance of panoramic
radiography compared with computed tomography in the evaluation of pathological
changes in the maxillary sinuses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2023;52(5):20230067. PMID: 37192021.
