TESOL ASSIGNMENT: ENGLISH-ONLY IDEOLOGY & TRANSLANGUAGING IN UZBEK EFL CLASSROOMS

Authors

  • Makhliyo Sodikova Author

Keywords:

THEORETICAL FOUNDATION. 1. Sociocultural Theory (Vygotsky, 1978; Thurnbury, 2003; Ortega, 2009) Learning is socially mediated; L1 supports scaffolding, concept formation, and reduces cognitive load. Translanguaging aligns with this theory, allowing learners to use multiple languages strategically in collaborative contexts. Translanguaging Theory (García, 2009; Canagarajah, 2011; Li Wei, 2018) Translanguaging treats multilingual repertoires as integrated and dynamic. Strategic L1 use enhances comprehension, confidence, and identity affirmation.

Abstract

In Uzbek EFL classrooms, the English-only ideology positions English as the 
sole legitimate medium of instruction. Teachers often enforce strict “faqat inglizcha 
gapiring” rules, assuming exclusive L2 exposure accelerates learning. However, 
learners naturally draw on Uzbek, Russian, and English, forming complex multilingual 
repertoires (Lippi-Green, 1997; Milroy & Milroy, 1999). Suppressing these resources 
limits comprehension, participation, and identity expression (Canagarajah, 2011; 
García & Wei, 2014). This issue is socially and educationally significant. English-only 
policies reinforce linguistic hierarchies, privilege certain accents, and marginalize 
learners who rely on L1 for comprehension. From an applied linguistics perspective, 
this reflects intersections of language ideology, power, and identity (Wodak, 2006; 
Baldauf, 2005; Kaplan & Baldauf, 2005). Investigating this clash is essential to 
understand the interactions of learner identities, teacher beliefs, and classroom 
practices in Uzbek EFL contexts.  

References

1. Baldauf, R. B., Jr. (2005). Language planning and policy in Asia. Multilingual

Matters.

2. Baugh, J. (2011). Black street speech: Its history, structure, and survival.

Oxford University Press.

3. Canagarajah, S. (2011). Translanguaging in the classroom: Emerging issues

for

research and pedagogy. Applied Linguistics Review, 2(1), 1–28.

https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110239331

4. Egbert, J. (2005). CALL essentials: Principles and practice in CALL

classrooms. TESOL Publications.

5. García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global

perspective. Wiley-Blackwell.

6. García, O., & Kleyn, T. (2016). Translanguaging and the writing of bilingual

learners.

Bilingual

Research

https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2016.1108714

Journal,

39(1),

6–23.

7. García, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and

education. Palgrave Macmillan.

8. Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford

University Press.

Published

2026-05-18

How to Cite

TESOL ASSIGNMENT: ENGLISH-ONLY IDEOLOGY & TRANSLANGUAGING IN UZBEK EFL CLASSROOMS . (2026). ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ, 93(3), 521-527. https://alpharesearchs.com/index.php/obr/article/view/498